Monday, June 16, 2014

Eureka Stamps Challenge #94 Friends

Happy Monday!



Thank you to everyone who participated in our 
"Father's Day Challenge" last week.

We had a fantastic turnout with so many amazing submissions! The team and I had an awesome time visiting your blogs to see your creativity in action! Fabulous Job!!!  We would love to have you visit the blogs of our DT and let them know what you liked about their creations.


We will select two winners each week 1 using Eureka Stamp image and 1 using any image!

Our Winners For Challenge #92

Eureka Stamp Image Winner 

16. Gail

Please go to the Eureka Stamps Store & Pick out the digital Images of your Choice!

Non -Eureka Stamp Image Winner 

12. Natalie Z.
 Please go to the Eureka Stamps Store & Pick out the digital Images of your Choice!


Congratulations! Please email Maribeth at eurekastamps.sponsorship@gmail.com with the words Eureka Challenge Winner in the Subject Line! 

* Also, don't forget to Grab the Winner Badge from our Side Bar for your Blog!!

Our TOP 5 PICKS for this week are ...

2. Jen Leeflang
3. Daemongirl
8. Katie Tate
17. Suze
11. Zora


Congratulations! Please Grab The Top 5 Badge From our Side Bar to Display on your Blog!


For full details on the designers' cards you can click on their name which is linked to their blogs! We love to hear from you, so you are always welcome to visit, we would love to receive your comments!

Reminder:
To play along with us, please post a direct link to the card/project on your blog using inlinkz and link back to our challenge from your blog! 

You can join in as many other challenges with ours as you like! You can only enter our challenge a MAXIMUM of 3 times per challenge. Please do NOT backlink to other cards you have previously Posted.

Crafty Hugs from Eureka Stamps

3 comments:

  1. Wow. Thanks for picking me among the Top 5 - I am thrilled. Congrats to the winners.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for picking my card in the Top 5 and big congrats to the other winners!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete